John Yates [1880–]
b. 1880 — Blackburn, England
- 1908 Coleman – Edmonton to Robson
- 1908 Collie to Robson
- 1909 English party at Robson (packer)
- 1910 Mumm and Collie at Robson
- — John Yates fonds V65. 1905–1924
John Yates [1880–]
b. 1880 — Blackburn, England
After Fulton Alexander McKirdy (1874-1960), an early settler in the Valemount area
Association with Mount Fryatt.
George Simpson [1792–1860]
b. 1792 — Loch Broom, Ross-Shire, Scotland
d. 1860
From Merk’s introduction to Fur Trade and Empire:
George Simpson who stood at the head of this great field organization [Hudson’s Bay Company was in 1821 a man with a future rather than a past. He was the illegitimate son of George Simpson, born at Loch Broom in Ross-shire, Scotland, in 1792. Of his early life little is known except that he was given a fair education, was brought to London in 1809, and as a clerk entered the employ of a firm engaged in the West India trade. His native heath in the early nineteenth century was a nursery ground for North American fur-trade leaders, but his own entrance into the industry was the result of his having attracted the favorable notice of Andrew Colvile, an influential member and later governor of the Hudson’s Bay Company. In the spring of 1820 he was sent by the Hudson’s Bay Company to the Athabasca Country to acquire experience in the Indian trade, and there he spent the winter of 1820-21. At that time the war with the North West Company was in the litigation stage, and Governor Williams was under indictment in the courts of Lower Canada. In order to be prepared for the contingency of his removal to Quebec, the Hudson’s Bay Company, in November, 1820, appointed Simpson governor locum tenens. At the coalition, at the age of twenty-nine, he was promoted to joint governorship, with Williams, of the Company Territories, with special charge of the Northern Department of Rupert’s Land including the Department of the Columbia. By 1826 he was governor-in-chief of all the Hudson’s Bay Company Territories in America.
To be governor of the Northern Department of Rupert’s Land in 1821 was to be brought face to face with harassing problems of post-war reconstruction. Rupert’s Land was strewn with the wreckage of battle. There was material wreckage in the form of exhaustion of fur preserves, the duplication of trading posts and the multiplication of equipment and men. More difficult to cope with was the psychological wreckage, mutual bitterness and hate of subordinates of the old companies now brought together in the coalition, habits of drunkenness which competition had fostered among the Indians, relaxed habits of discipline among servants, and the propensity to waste and extravagance formed by the whole fur-trading community. These were the rehabilitation problems of the new governor and they were a test of his quality.
He came to his task with an intellectual equipment that promised much for his success. He had, to be sure, only scant experience in Rupert’s Land, but that was an element of strength rather than of weakness in 1821 since it had as its corollary freedom from the rancors of the war. Indeed, it was one of the chief reasons for appointing him rather than his senior colleague to the great Northern Department. He combined with a sure judgment an exterior of affability that enabled him to heal old wounds and to reconcile men to a new order. As an administrator his talents were exceptional. He had the imaginative vision of a Clive; he drew his plans on a scale that was continental. With vision he combined a grasp of detail that was extraordinary. There was no element of the fur trade from the Athabasca Country to the Sandwich Islands, from Hudson Bay to the steppes of Siberia, that he did not acquaint himself with by personal visit. He was a dynamo of energy, tireless at his work, whether at his desk or on the march. His journeys were famous for their speed; on the present voyage, though he took a route that was unfavorable in passing from Hudson Bay to the Columbia and lost many days by halts for business, he cut the record for the distance from 104 days to 84. On his return, to save time in an emergency, he made a perilous and exhausting overland march from Carlton to the Red River Settlement. His party, when it met relief within a half-day’s march of the Settlement, was half famished and utterly spent, but not the Governor. Without pausing for food or rest he threw himself upon a horse brought by the relief party and galloped off to his duties at Fort Garry. He put the spurs as remorselessly to his subordinates, high and low, as to himself. There is an unsubstantiated legend, which used to circulate in the Red River Colony, that on one occasion his goading drove one of his favorite voyageurs to the point of seizing him by the collar, lifting him into the water, and holding him there until he promised to relent his pace.
With drive he combined a penchant for orderliness, a product of his counting-house experience and a source of frequent discomfiture to unsystematic clerks and post officials whose accounts he examined on his unannounced tours of inspection through the country. He was the never wearying apostle of economy. To be wasteful or to indulge in what he called “luxuries,” which were ordinary European supplies, were offences that grated like a rasp on his Scotch soul. “One would think,” is his indignant reply to a requisition sent in by a post officer for mustard, “from the quantity you order, that it is intended to be used in the Indian trade.” From Merk’s introduction to Fur Trade and Empire:
George Simpson who stood at the head of this great field organization [Hudson’s Bay Company was in 1821 a man with a future rather than a past. He was the illegitimate son of George Simpson, born at Loch Broom in Ross-shire, Scotland, in 1792. Of his early life little is known except that he was given a fair education, was brought to London in 1809, and as a clerk entered the employ of a firm engaged in the West India trade. His native heath in the early nineteenth century was a nursery ground for North American fur-trade leaders, but his own entrance into the industry was the result of his having attracted the favorable notice of Andrew Colvile, an influential member and later governor of the Hudson’s Bay Company. In the spring of 1820 he was sent by the Hudson’s Bay Company to the Athabasca Country to acquire experience in the Indian trade, and there he spent the winter of 1820-21. At that time the war with the North West Company was in the litigation stage, and Governor Williams was under indictment in the courts of Lower Canada. In order to be prepared for the contingency of his removal to Quebec, the Hudson’s Bay Company, in November, 1820, appointed Simpson governor locum tenens. At the coalition, at the age of twenty-nine, he was promoted to joint governorship, with Williams, of the Company Territories, with special charge of the Northern Department of Rupert’s Land including the Department of the Columbia. By 1826 he was governor-in-chief of all the Hudson’s Bay Company Territories in America.
To be governor of the Northern Department of Rupert’s Land in 1821 was to be brought face to face with harassing problems of post-war reconstruction. Rupert’s Land was strewn with the wreckage of battle. There was material wreckage in the form of exhaustion of fur preserves, the duplication of trading posts and the multiplication of equipment and men. More difficult to cope with was the psychological wreckage, mutual bitterness and hate of subordinates of the old companies now brought together in the coalition, habits of drunkenness which competition had fostered among the Indians, relaxed habits of discipline among servants, and the propensity to waste and extravagance formed by the whole fur-trading community. These were the rehabilitation problems of the new governor and they were a test of his quality.
He came to his task with an intellectual equipment that promised much for his success. He had, to be sure, only scant experience in Rupert’s Land, but that was an element of strength rather than of weakness in 1821 since it had as its corollary freedom from the rancors of the war. Indeed, it was one of the chief reasons for appointing him rather than his senior colleague to the great Northern Department. He combined with a sure judgment an exterior of affability that enabled him to heal old wounds and to reconcile men to a new order. As an administrator his talents were exceptional. He had the imaginative vision of a Clive; he drew his plans on a scale that was continental. With vision he combined a grasp of detail that was extraordinary. There was no element of the fur trade from the Athabasca Country to the Sandwich Islands, from Hudson Bay to the steppes of Siberia, that he did not acquaint himself with by personal visit. He was a dynamo of energy, tireless at his work, whether at his desk or on the march. His journeys were famous for their speed; on the present voyage, though he took a route that was unfavorable in passing from Hudson Bay to the Columbia and lost many days by halts for business, he cut the record for the distance from 104 days to 84. On his return, to save time in an emergency, he made a perilous and exhausting overland march from Carlton to the Red River Settlement. His party, when it met relief within a half-day’s march of the Settlement, was half famished and utterly spent, but not the Governor. Without pausing for food or rest he threw himself upon a horse brought by the relief party and galloped off to his duties at Fort Garry. He put the spurs as remorselessly to his subordinates, high and low, as to himself. There is an unsubstantiated legend, which used to circulate in the Red River Colony, that on one occasion his goading drove one of his favorite voyageurs to the point of seizing him by the collar, lifting him into the water, and holding him there until he promised to relent his pace.
With drive he combined a penchant for orderliness, a product of his counting-house experience and a source of frequent discomfiture to unsystematic clerks and post officials whose accounts he examined on his unannounced tours of inspection through the country. He was the never wearying apostle of economy. To be wasteful or to indulge in what he called “luxuries,” which were ordinary European supplies, were offences that grated like a rasp on his Scotch soul. “One would think,” is his indignant reply to a requisition sent in by a post officer for mustard, “from the quantity you order, that it is intended to be used in the Indian trade.”
From Merk’s introduction to Fur Trade and Empire:
George Simpson who stood at the head of this great field organization [Hudson’s Bay Company was in 1821 a man with a future rather than a past. He was the illegitimate son of George Simpson, born at Loch Broom in Ross-shire, Scotland, in 1792. Of his early life little is known except that he was given a fair education, was brought to London in 1809, and as a clerk entered the employ of a firm engaged in the West India trade. His native heath in the early nineteenth century was a nursery ground for North American fur-trade leaders, but his own entrance into the industry was the result of his having attracted the favorable notice of Andrew Colvile, an influential member and later governor of the Hudson’s Bay Company. In the spring of 1820 he was sent by the Hudson’s Bay Company to the Athabasca Country to acquire experience in the Indian trade, and there he spent the winter of 1820-21. At that time the war with the North West Company was in the litigation stage, and Governor Williams was under indictment in the courts of Lower Canada. In order to be prepared for the contingency of his removal to Quebec, the Hudson’s Bay Company, in November, 1820, appointed Simpson governor locum tenens. At the coalition, at the age of twenty-nine, he was promoted to joint governorship, with Williams, of the Company Territories, with special charge of the Northern Department of Rupert’s Land including the Department of the Columbia. By 1826 he was governor-in-chief of all the Hudson’s Bay Company Territories in America.
To be governor of the Northern Department of Rupert’s Land in 1821 was to be brought face to face with harassing problems of post-war reconstruction. Rupert’s Land was strewn with the wreckage of battle. There was material wreckage in the form of exhaustion of fur preserves, the duplication of trading posts and the multiplication of equipment and men. More difficult to cope with was the psychological wreckage, mutual bitterness and hate of subordinates of the old companies now brought together in the coalition, habits of drunkenness which competition had fostered among the Indians, relaxed habits of discipline among servants, and the propensity to waste and extravagance formed by the whole fur-trading community. These were the rehabilitation problems of the new governor and they were a test of his quality.
He came to his task with an intellectual equipment that promised much for his success. He had, to be sure, only scant experience in Rupert’s Land, but that was an element of strength rather than of weakness in 1821 since it had as its corollary freedom from the rancors of the war. Indeed, it was one of the chief reasons for appointing him rather than his senior colleague to the great Northern Department. He combined with a sure judgment an exterior of affability that enabled him to heal old wounds and to reconcile men to a new order. As an administrator his talents were exceptional. He had the imaginative vision of a Clive; he drew his plans on a scale that was continental. With vision he combined a grasp of detail that was extraordinary. There was no element of the fur trade from the Athabasca Country to the Sandwich Islands, from Hudson Bay to the steppes of Siberia, that he did not acquaint himself with by personal visit. He was a dynamo of energy, tireless at his work, whether at his desk or on the march. His journeys were famous for their speed; on the present voyage, though he took a route that was unfavorable in passing from Hudson Bay to the Columbia and lost many days by halts for business, he cut the record for the distance from 104 days to 84. On his return, to save time in an emergency, he made a perilous and exhausting overland march from Carlton to the Red River Settlement. His party, when it met relief within a half-day’s march of the Settlement, was half famished and utterly spent, but not the Governor. Without pausing for food or rest he threw himself upon a horse brought by the relief party and galloped off to his duties at Fort Garry. He put the spurs as remorselessly to his subordinates, high and low, as to himself. There is an unsubstantiated legend, which used to circulate in the Red River Colony, that on one occasion his goading drove one of his favorite voyageurs to the point of seizing him by the collar, lifting him into the water, and holding him there until he promised to relent his pace.
With drive he combined a penchant for orderliness, a product of his counting-house experience and a source of frequent discomfiture to unsystematic clerks and post officials whose accounts he examined on his unannounced tours of inspection through the country. He was the never wearying apostle of economy. To be wasteful or to indulge in what he called “luxuries,” which were ordinary European supplies, were offences that grated like a rasp on his Scotch soul. “One would think,” is his indignant reply to a requisition sent in by a post officer for mustard, “from the quantity you order, that it is intended to be used in the Indian trade.” (1)
Hugh Drummond Allan [1887–1917]
b. 1887 — Partick, Lanarkshire, Scotland
d. 1917 — Croiselles, France
Hugh Drummond Allan was born in Scotland and came to Canada around 1907. He became a British Columbia Land Surveyor in 1912. His professional work was carried on mainly in the Kamloops district, where he resided, and the North Thompson River valley. In 1913 he surveyed in the Canoe River area. “From Mile 49 on the Grand Trunk Pacific I proceeded with my party by wagon and reached the Canoe River in one day,” he reported.
Allan was shortly predeceased by his wife and infant child, whether before or after his enlistment after the start of the first World War in 1914. He returned to Scotland and enlisted in Princess Louise’s (Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders). In March 1916, Allen, then second lieutenant, made a will in which he bequeathed all his fortune to “Mrs. Kelly,” the mother of his late wife, Gladys Irene Frederika Allan. “[A]nd I declare that I leave nothing to my own relatives not from any want of affection but because they are much better provided for than my late wife’s relatives and I have not a great deal to leave.”
Sometime in 1916 he was wounded, and in 1917 he was killed leading his company at Croiselles, France.
His estate was probated in 1917, coming to a value of $5540. In March 1918 his executor discovered that “there was due to the said deceased from the Imperial Pensions Department the sum of $532.96.”
The National Archives of the U.K. has officer service records pertaining to Lieutenant Hugh Drummond Allan of Princess Louise’s (Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders).
There is another Canadian figure of Scottish birth named Hugh Allan [1810–1882], a shipping magnate.
A. L. (Pete) Withers
Rollin Thomas Chamberlin [1881–1948]
b. 1881 — Beloit, Wisconsin, USA
d. 1948
Rollin Thomas Chamberlin, 1881-1948, was a geologist and mountaineer at Chicago, Illinois. Chamberlin was an eminent Professor of Geology at the University of Chicago who, in 1910, made numerous guided climbs in the Rocky and Selkirk Mountains, including the Lake Louise, Lake O’Hara, Field and Glacier areas. In 1924, Chamberlin, Allen Carpe and A. L. Withers made a number of first ascents in the Cariboo Mountains, including Mount Titan (now Mount Sir Wilfred Laurier) and Mount Challenger.
Allen Carpé [1894–1932]
b. 1894 — Chicago,
d. 1932
Adopted in 1925 as labelled on BC-Alberta Boundary sheets 38 & 39. In lieu of original paperwork this name was reconfirmed 16 July 1963. May have previously been labeled as Wapumoon Lake.
A descriptive name given by Samuel Prescott Fay [1884–1971] in 1914, spelled by him “Wapumoon.”
“Wapumun” is recorded as being a Cree word interpreted as “mirror” or “reflection.”