Athabasca River and Columbia River drainages
E of Iroquois Creek, overlooking Athabasca Pass
52.3833 N 118.25 W — Map 83D/8 — Google — GeoHack
Earliest known reference to this name is 1827 (David Douglas)
Name officially adopted in 1921
Official in BC – Topo map from Canadian Geographical Names
Elevation: 2791 m
John Arrowsmith’s map British North America 1832
John Arrowsmith’s map BC 1859
Palliser Map 1863
Milton and Cheadle’s map 1865
Trutch’s map of BC 1871
George Monro Grant’s map of Yellowhead Pass 1872
Tolmie and Dawson map Indian Tribes of BC 1884
Schäffer map of visits in 1907 and 1908
Cram’s map British Columbia 1913 [as “Mt. Brown 9,050”]
Boundary Commission Sheet 27 (surveyed in 1920 & 1921)
Boundary Commission Sheet 27 A (surveyed in 1921)
After breakfast, about one o’clock, being well refreshed, I set out with the view of ascending what seemed to be the highest peak on the north. The height from its apparent base exceeds 6000 feet, 17,000 feet above the level of the sea. After passing over the lower ridge of about 200 feet, by far the most difficult and fatiguing part, on snow-shoes, there was a crust on the snow, over which I walked with the greatest ease. A few mosses and lichens, Andreae and Jungermanniae, were seen. At the elevation of 4800 feet vegetation no longer exists not so much as a lichen of any kind to be seen, 1200 feet of eternal ice. The view from the summit is of that cast too awful to afford pleasure nothing as far as the eye can reach in every direction but mountains towering above each other, rugged beyond all description; the dazzling reflection from the snow, the heavenly arena of the solid glacier, and the rainbow-like tints of its shattered fragments, together with the enormous icicles suspended from the perpendicular rocks ; the majestic but terrible avalanche hurtling down from the southerly exposed rocks producing a crash, and groans through the distant valleys, only equalled by an earthquake. Such gives us a sense of the stupendous and wondrous works of the Almighty. This peak, the highest yet known in the northern continent of America, I felt a sincere pleasure in naming MOUNT BROWN, in honour of R. Brown, Esq., the illustrious botanist, no less distinguished by the amiable qualities of his refined mind. A little to the south is one nearly of the same height, rising more into a sharp point, which I named MOUNT HOOKER, in honour of my early patron the enlightened and learned Professor of Botany in the University of Glasgow, Dr. Hooker, to whose kindness I, in a great measure, owe my success hitherto in life, and I feel exceedingly glad of an opportunity of recording a simple but sincere token of my kindest regard for him and respect for his profound talents. .” [1]
Robert Brown [1775–1858], the first keeper of the botanical department in the British Museum, was also the namesake of Brownian motion, the incessant motion of microscopic particles suspended in fluids. David Douglas was his student. Douglas’s ascent was the earliest recorded climb in the Canadian Rockies. [2]
When mountaineers first came to the Rockies in the late nineteenth century, they were anxious to find and climb this “highest yet known” peak. [3] In 1893 the highest mountain Arthur Philemon Coleman [1852–1939] could find near the Athabasca Pass was about 9,000 feet (2740 m) high. [4] In 1908 Hugh Edward Millington Stutfield [1858–1929] and John Norman Collie [1859–1942] took another look for the 17,000 foot Mount Brown and nearby 16,000 foot Mount Douglas. “If David Douglas climbed a 17,000 foot peak alone on a May afternoon,” they wrote, “when the snow must have been pretty deep on the ground, all one can say is that he must have been an uncommonly active person. What, of course, he really did was to ascent the Mount Brown of Professor Arthur Coleman. These two fabulous Titans, which for nearly seventy years have been masquerading as the monarches of the Canadian Rockies, must now be finally deposed, and Mounts Forbes, Columbia, and Alberta, with Peak Robson, west of the Yellowhead Pass, must reign in their stead. [5]”
Edward Willet Dorland Holway [1853–1923], in “New Light on Mounts Brown and Hooker,” states, “My theory is that possibly after he [Douglas] returned to England he learned of Thompson’s Survey and that he then inserted the height and named the mountains.” [6]
David Thompson’s [1770–1857] Narrative of his explorations in western America, under March 10th, 1809:
At the greatest elevation of the passage across the Mountains by the Athabasca River the point by boiling water gave 11,000 feet and the peaks are full 7,000 feet above this passage; and the general height may be fairly taken at 18,000 feet above the Pacific Ocean. [7]
- 1. Douglas, David [1799–1834]. Journal kept by David Douglas during his travels in North America 1823-1827, together with a particular description of thirty-three species of American oaks and eighteen species of Pinus, with appendices containing a list of the plants introduced by Douglas and an account of his death in 1834. Royal Horticultural Society, 1914, p. 71. Internet Archive [accessed 10 March 2025]
- 2. Akrigg, Helen B., and Akrigg, George Philip Vernon [1913–2001]. British Columbia Place Names. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1997. Internet Archive [accessed 6 February 2025]
- 3. Wheeler, Arthur Oliver [1860–1945]. “The location of Mts. Brown and Hooker.” Canadian Alpine Journal, Vol. 12 (1921–1922):123-129
- 4. Coleman, Arthur Philemon [1852–1939]. The Canadian Rockies: New and Old Trails. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1911. Internet Archive [accessed 3 March 2025]
- 5. Stutfield, Hugh Edward Millington M. [1858–1929], and Collie, John Norman Norman [1859–1942]. Climbs and Explorations in the Canadian Rockies. London: Longmans, Green, 1903. University of British Columbia Library [accessed 10 March 2025]
- 6. Holway, Edward Willet Dorland [1853–1923]. “Mt. Longstaff.” Canadian Alpine Journal, 8 (1917):109
- 7. Thompson, David [1770–1857]. David Thompson’s Narrative of his explorations in western America, 1784-1812. Joseph Burr Tyrrell, editor. Toronto: Champlain Society, 1916. University of British Columbia [accessed 10 March 2025]
Wrote this piece back in the day and saw it published in Alberta History. It has been referenced from time to time. Basically, as other over-estimated mountains saw their elevations reduced, Hooker and Brown, due to their relative isolation had this process delayed – hence the creation of ‘giants’.
Time and weather conditions did not allow me to make the ascent. I also did not have the opportunity to check for any terminal moraines, even one of small cobbles or boulders, that could give me an estimate of the extent of ice during the Little Ice Age on that mountain’s slope.
Cheers.
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Chasing+the+giants.-a0249869587